| --- Log opened Fri Dec 18 00:00:07 2015 | ||
| -!- ysionnea1 is now known as ysionneau | 13:04 | |
| olofk | juliusb: Yeah, I contacted him a few years ago to get ordb2a added when I was on the ORSoC payroll :) | 17:45 |
|---|---|---|
| olofk | _franck_: I'll take a look at it | 17:46 |
| olofk | juliusb: But surely there must be a better option than de0 nano. It's cheap, but it doesn't have any connectors whatsoever | 17:49 |
| olofk | Atlys boards are also still very popular it seems | 17:49 |
| olofk | _franck_: I still get some warnings in jtag_vpi http://3b59c5d360e065c9.paste.se/ | 20:32 |
| olofk | oh.. that was actually an error | 20:33 |
| olofk | man 2 write says that n should be a ssize_t | 20:35 |
| olofk | _franck_: Pull request sent | 20:44 |
| olofk | Made some changes to the modelsim backend in fusesoc. Shit might break. Let me know | 20:50 |
| _franck_ | olofk: if I remove timescale from jtag_vpi.v I get http://pastie.org/10640656 | 20:56 |
| olofk | _franck_: Is that with your sim script? | 20:57 |
| olofk | Ah ok. I also see that I get another warning when I change to ssize_t | 20:57 |
| _franck_ | olofk: yes it s | 20:58 |
| _franck_ | is | 20:58 |
| _franck_ | I don't want to break jtag_vpi own testbench | 20:59 |
| olofk | I understand. I'll try to fix that | 21:00 |
| olofk | I was going to tell you to use fusesoc instead of your test script, but I realized that we can't run things in paralell that way | 21:01 |
| olofk | ah.. this was trickier than I had hoped it would be. The simple way is probably to make a FuseSoC-specific patch for this instead | 21:08 |
| olofk | _franck_: I fixed it for FuseSoC now. Check the latest commit in orpsoc-cores | 21:16 |
| olofk | Time to sleep now | 21:16 |
| olofk | And thanks for testing and not just blindly apply my hysterical pull requests :) | 21:17 |
| _franck_ | :) | 21:23 |
| --- Log closed Sat Dec 19 00:00:08 2015 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!