| --- Log opened Sun Nov 27 00:00:01 2016 | ||
| shorne | smaller spam send to gdb patch list now | 01:20 |
|---|---|---|
| olofk | shorne: Is it really a byte access? Isn't it an unaligned word access (again, I should probably learn C some day :)) | 15:24 |
| olofk | and good job with the patches | 15:24 |
| kc5tja | olofk: Question for you, if I may. | 15:24 |
| kc5tja | olofk: If I have a processor design, and I develop some support modules intended to go with it, should I place those modules in the same repo, or should they go in separate repos? | 15:25 |
| kc5tja | For example, I developed what I believe is a good Wishbone bridge to my CPU's native bus, and right now it's just kind of "floating about" in the example documentation in the datasheet/docs. But, I think it could be of use in general too. | 15:27 |
| olofk | kc5tja: If they're all dealing with your CPU/bus and are quite small, I think you could put them in a single repo | 17:04 |
| olofk | For the wishbone stuff, I decided to put the arbiters, data resizers and CDC component in the same repo as they're all dealing with interconnects | 17:06 |
| olofk | The BFM however, is in a separate repo | 17:06 |
| olofk | But as long as no one else is using the code, I'd say it's more or less down to personal taste | 17:08 |
| kc5tja | OK, I'll re-arrange the repo to include the different components in different directories. | 17:12 |
| shorne | olofk: you are right, its different because its word access. FYI, with newlib users can setup their own exception handlers in the "userspace" program. I guess we can suggest this for this case. | 20:25 |
| --- Log closed Mon Nov 28 00:00:03 2016 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!