| --- Log opened Fri Nov 04 00:00:27 2016 | ||
| bandvig | olofk: Olof, on 29 October I sent a post in LibreCores's OpenRISC list. It achieved list archive: https://lists.librecores.org/pipermail/openrisc/2016-October/000129.html | 07:23 |
|---|---|---|
| bandvig | olofk: However, I haven't received my own post back even so appropriate option is set "Yes" in my configuration settings. | 07:23 |
| bandvig | olofk: Moreover, I asked SMD and he also did not receive this post while posts on 31 October and 1 November he received (me too). Could you check what was happened? | 07:24 |
| stekern | bandvig: is it this mail: "[OpenRISC] Question on float64 instructions support | 07:52 |
| stekern | " | 07:52 |
| bandvig | stekern: yes | 07:56 |
| stekern | I've got it | 07:56 |
| stekern | to answer about the extra cruft with saving r1, there is some hack in our gcc port that adds that for some reason I can't remember | 07:57 |
| stekern | (but that's not what your main question in that mail was) | 07:57 |
| bandvig | stekern: I've started to study binutils internals (CGEN in particular). My plan is to make ORFPX64A32 in a manner similar to SPARC-V8. | 08:00 |
| shorne | wbx: your build looks slightly differen than mine, I am using gcc 5.4.0 | 16:24 |
| shorne | musl 1.1.14, binutils 2.26 to build busybox, 1.26 | 16:26 |
| shorne | one interesting thing is yours does not build with l.swa/l.lwa inscns, that is where mine is failing | 16:26 |
| shorne | https://gist.github.com/stffrdhrn/837c6547eea8b43d089246061127c994 | 16:27 |
| -!- ZipCPU_ is now known as ZipCPU | 16:54 | |
| --- Log closed Sat Nov 05 00:00:28 2016 | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.15.2 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!